Political Incentives to Privatize
نویسنده
چکیده
The scope of the public sector (i.e. what activities are undertaken by public rather than private entities) is a decision made by politicians. While there are economic costs and benefits to privatization, there is also a political benefit to incumbents: By privatizing today, politicians transfer future revenues (when they might not be in office) to the present. This political benefit leads to over-privatization. We show that this political benefit persists even if politicians are able to borrow against public assets. We analyze the relationship between privatization and over-privatization with the political environment, as well as complete a normative analysis of the costs and benefits to society of allowing politicians to privatize assets. ∗Assistant Professor, Harris School of Public Policy, 1130 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 †MPP Candidate, Harris School of Public Policy, 1130 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637
منابع مشابه
Document De Treball Creap2006-03 Factors Explainig Local Privatization: a Meta-regression Analysis
Privatization of local public services has been implemented worldwide in the last decades. Why local governments privatize has been the subject of much discussion, and many empirical works have been devoted to analyzing the factors that explain local privatization. Such works have found a great diversity of motivations, and the variation among reported empirical results is large. To investigate...
متن کاملThe optimal choice of privatizing state-owned enterprises: A political economic model
We study the choices of two types of maximizing Public Servants over how far to carry privatization of industries and in what order to privatize. Two stylizations of the Public Servant's objectives are considered, a Niskanen-style Bureaucrat who maximizes a surplus budget subject to the constraint of staying in office, and a Populist who maximizes popularity/consumer welfare subject to the cons...
متن کاملPolitical consequences of financial market expansion: Does buying a mutual fund turn you Republican?
This paper investigates the political consequences of the broad spread of stock ownership among US households over the past 25 years. Using four cross-sections of the American National Election Study from 1998 to 2004, and a three-wave panel from 2000-2004, we find a consistent positive relationship between stockownership and identifying as a Republican after controlling for obvious confounds. ...
متن کاملPolitical Incentives to Suppress Negative Financial Information: Evidence from State-controlled Chinese Firms
This paper examines the impact that political forces have on the flow of negative financial information into stock prices. Using a unique sample of listed Chinese firms ultimately controlled by local and/or provincial government entities, we test the proposition that the incentives of politicians and the local government shape financial reporting practices, especially with respect to the releas...
متن کاملInterregional Patient Mobility in the Italian NHS: A Case of Badly-Managed Decentralization; Comment on “Regional Incentives and Patient Cross-Border Mobility: Evidence From the Italian Experience”
The article by Brenna and Spandonaro on interregional mobility for acute hospital care in Italy raises important issues concerning social and territorial equity in a healthcare system. Based on Regions and private providers’ strategic behavior, the hypothesis adopted to explain patient cross-border mobility (CBM), demonstrated by statistical analysis, may be further explored using qualitative m...
متن کامل